party: be important in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents birthday party
Weight: 0.86
, political party
Weight: 0.82
, third party
Weight: 0.77
, socialist party
Weight: 0.77
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.95
, conservative party
Weight: 0.84
, communist party
Weight: 0.83
, liberal party
Weight: 0.82
, democratic party
Weight: 0.81

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in canada 1.00
be in usa 0.85
be in uk 0.83
form in australia 0.83
survive in uk england 0.80
be in america 0.79
be good for america 0.79
be important to american system 0.79
be much more viable in uk 0.76
be hard for people with ms 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(political party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(political party, form in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(political party, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(third party, be much more viable in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(political party, be important in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(third party, survive in uk england)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(political party, be in america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(political party, form in australia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(third party, be much more viable in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(political party, be important in canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(political party, form in australia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(third party, survive in uk england)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(political party, be in america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(third party, be much more viable in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be in uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(political party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(political party, form in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(political party, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(third party, be much more viable in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(party, be important in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(conservative party, be in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(conservative party, be in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(party, be important in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(party, be good for america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(party, be good for america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(party, be good for america)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(party, be good for america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(party, be important in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(political party, be important in canada)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(third party, be much more viable in uk)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(political party, be in america)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(political party, form in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(conservative party, be in uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(political party, be important in canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(political party, form in australia)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(political party, be in america)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(party, be important in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(third party, be much more viable in uk)