pash: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality mark 0.77
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pash, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pash, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pash, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pash, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pash, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(pash, has quality mark)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(pash, has quality definition)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pash, has quality mark)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pash, has quality definition)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pash, has quality mark)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pash, has quality definition)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pash, has quality definition)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pash, has quality mark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pash, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(pash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pash, has quality good)