pasta: is more popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.64
, favorite
Weight: 0.63
, starch
Weight: 0.63
, staple
Weight: 0.62
Siblings meatball
Weight: 0.54
, ravioli
Weight: 0.48
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, lasagna
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more popular 1.00
is popular 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pasta, is more popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pasta, is more popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lasagna, is popular)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lasagna, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pasta, is more popular)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pasta, is popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pasta, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pasta, is popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pasta, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pasta, is more popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pasta, is more popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lasagna, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pasta, is more popular)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is popular)