patent: act as incentive to technological innovation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
act as incentive to technological innovation 1.00
act as incentive to innovation 0.96
be important for innovation 0.89
encourage technological process 0.88
encourage innovation 0.87
encourage technological progress 0.86
promote innovation 0.85
act as incentive 0.83
affect follow on innovation 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage innovation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, promote innovation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(patent, act as incentive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(patent, encourage innovation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(patent, act as incentive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patent, be important for innovation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(patent, promote innovation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(patent, encourage innovation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage innovation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(patent, promote innovation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(patent, promote innovation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for innovation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(patent, be important for innovation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(patent, act as incentive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological progress)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)