patent: affect follow on innovation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect follow on innovation 1.00
be important for innovation 0.90
encourage innovation 0.89
promote innovation 0.87
affect follow 0.83
act as incentive to technological innovation 0.83
act as incentive to innovation 0.82
encourage technological progress 0.77
encourage technological process 0.77
affect design 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(application, affect design)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(application, affect design)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(application, affect design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage innovation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, promote innovation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(patent, affect follow)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(patent, affect follow)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(patent, encourage innovation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(patent, affect follow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(patent, affect follow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patent, be important for innovation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(patent, promote innovation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage innovation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(patent, encourage innovation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(patent, promote innovation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(patent, promote innovation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for innovation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(patent, be important for innovation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological process)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological progress)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(application, affect design)