patent: be important for innovation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for innovation 1.00
promote innovation 0.92
encourage innovation 0.92
affect follow on innovation 0.90
act as incentive to technological innovation 0.89
act as incentive to innovation 0.87
encourage technological process 0.78
encourage technological progress 0.78
be important to business 0.78
protecting creativity 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patent, be important for innovation)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, promote innovation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage innovation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(patent, promote innovation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(patent, encourage innovation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(patent, promote innovation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(patent, encourage innovation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(patent, affect follow on innovation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(patent, promote innovation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage innovation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(patent, act as incentive to technological innovation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(patent, act as incentive to innovation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, be important to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(patent, be important to business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological progress)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for innovation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(patent, be important for innovation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(patent, be important for innovation)