patent: be important for tncs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for tncs 1.00
be important to those 0.81
be important to business 0.81
is valuable 0.80
is useful 0.78
be important to countries 0.78
be important to society 0.77
be important in research 0.77
is needed 0.76
be important for employees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(development, is needed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(development, is needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(development, be important for employees)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(development, be important for employees)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(device, is useful)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(invention, be important to society)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(invention, is valuable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(application, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(invention, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(development, be important for employees)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(development, is needed)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(invention, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(invention, is valuable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(application, is useful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(application, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(invention, is needed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(invention, is needed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(invention, be important to society)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(invention, be important to society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patent, be important for tncs)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(patent, is needed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(patent, be important to those)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, be important to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, be important to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(patent, is useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(patent, be important to those)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(patent, is needed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(patent, is needed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(patent, is valuable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(patent, be important to business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, be important to those)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(patent, is valuable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(patent, is useful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(patent, is useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(patent, is valuable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(patent, is valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, is needed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(invention, is needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(invention, is valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(invention, be important to society)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, is needed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, is useful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(development, be important for employees)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(patent, be important for tncs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)