patent: be important to those

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to those 1.00
be important for tncs 0.81
have different resistivities 0.76
have impact on individuals 0.75
have positive impact on individuals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(patent, be important to those)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(patent, be important to those)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(material, have different resistivities)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(patent, be important to those)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(material, have different resistivities)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(material, have different resistivities)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(method, have positive impact on individuals)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, have impact on individuals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, be important to those)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, be important to those)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(material, have different resistivities)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, be important to those)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(patent, be important to those)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(patent, be important to those)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(material, have different resistivities)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact on individuals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(material, have different resistivities)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(patent, be important to those)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact on individuals)