patent: cause more harm than good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
cause more harm than good 1.00
affect capacity in given area for species other than humans 0.75
alch for less 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(patent, cause more harm than good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(patent, cause more harm than good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(patent, cause more harm than good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(patent, cause more harm than good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(patent, cause more harm than good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(patent, cause more harm than good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(development, affect capacity in given area for species other than humans)