patent: cost money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost money 1.00
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(application, cost money)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(patent, cost money)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(patent, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(patent, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(patent, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(patent, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(patent, cost money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(patent, cost money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(patent, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)