patent: encourage process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
encourage process 1.00
encourage people 0.91
encourage develop 0.89
encourage technological process 0.88
encourage progress 0.86
encourage innovation 0.83
encourage technological progress 0.80
promote development 0.76
is continuous process 0.76
is dynamic process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(development, is dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(patent, encourage process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(development, is continuous process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(patent, encourage process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(development, is continuous process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(development, is dynamic process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(development, is continuous process)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(development, is dynamic process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(development, is dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(development, is continuous process)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(patent, encourage process)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage develop)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage progress)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage innovation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(patent, encourage progress)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(patent, promote development)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(patent, encourage develop)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(patent, encourage develop)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage progress)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(patent, encourage people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage develop)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(patent, encourage progress)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(patent, encourage innovation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage innovation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(patent, encourage innovation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, encourage technological progress)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(patent, encourage people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(patent, promote development)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(patent, promote development)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(patent, promote development)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(patent, encourage technological progress)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(patent, encourage process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, is dynamic process)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(development, is continuous process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(development, is dynamic process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(patent, encourage process)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(development, is continuous process)