patent: has state office

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state office 1.00
office 0.94
has state works 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has state works)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(algorithm, has state works)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has state works)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(patent, has state office)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(patent, office)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(patent, office)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(patent, office)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(patent, office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(patent, has state office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(patent, has state office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(patent, has state office)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(algorithm, has state works)