patent: is needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is needed 1.00
is necessary 0.86
is required 0.82
be important for tncs 0.76
needed for respiration 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(development, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(patent, is needed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(method, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(patent, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(material, needed for respiration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(patent, is needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(development, is needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(method, is necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(material, needed for respiration)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(material, needed for respiration)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(development, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(method, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(invention, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, is required)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(development, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(patent, is needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(method, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(patent, is needed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(material, needed for respiration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(patent, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(invention, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(invention, is needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(algorithm, is required) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(algorithm, is required)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(patent, is needed)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(patent, is necessary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(patent, is required)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(patent, is required)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important for tncs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(patent, is required)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(patent, is required)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(patent, is necessary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(patent, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(patent, is necessary)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patent, be important for tncs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(patent, be important for tncs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(patent, be important for tncs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(patent, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, is needed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(method, is necessary)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(material, needed for respiration)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(invention, is needed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(algorithm, is required)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(development, is needed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(method, is necessary)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(patent, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(material, needed for respiration)