path: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.59
, string
Weight: 0.57
Siblings route
Weight: 0.68
, trail
Weight: 0.62
, line segment
Weight: 0.56
, boulder
Weight: 0.56
, wicca
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality right 0.90
has quality class 0.82
is great 0.81
feel good 0.80
is good thing 0.78
has quality religion 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(path, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(path, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(string, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(path, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(string, feel good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(path, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(approach, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(string, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(string, has quality class)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(approach, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(string, has quality class)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(string, feel good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boulder, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wicca, has quality religion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(path, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(path, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(string, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(path, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(string, feel good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(path, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(boulder, is great)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(boulder, is great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wicca, has quality religion)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wicca, has quality religion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(path, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(path, has quality better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(path, has quality better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(path, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(path, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(string, feel good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(string, has quality class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wicca, has quality religion)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(boulder, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(string, feel good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(path, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(string, has quality class)