path: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.59
, string
Weight: 0.57
Siblings route
Weight: 0.68
, trail
Weight: 0.62
, line segment
Weight: 0.56
, boulder
Weight: 0.56
, wicca
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be expensive 0.99
is now expensive 0.94
is desirable 0.78
is estate expensive 0.77
is real estate expensive 0.77
is attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(string, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(path, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(string, is now expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(path, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(string, is desirable)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(path, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(string, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(string, is now expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(string, is desirable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(string, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(string, is now expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(string, is desirable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(boulder, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(line segment, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(boulder, is real estate expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(boulder, is estate expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(trail, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(string, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(path, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(string, is now expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(path, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(string, is desirable)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(path, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(line segment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(line segment, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(boulder, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(boulder, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(trail, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(trail, is attractive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(boulder, is real estate expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(boulder, is real estate expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(boulder, is estate expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(boulder, is estate expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(path, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(path, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(string, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(string, is now expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(string, is desirable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(boulder, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(boulder, is real estate expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(line segment, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trail, is attractive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(boulder, is estate expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(string, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(string, is now expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(path, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(string, is desirable)