pathogen: be more virulent in new habitat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microorganism
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, nucleic acid
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fungus
Weight: 0.78
, staphylococcus
Weight: 0.77
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.73
, salmonella
Weight: 0.72
, bacillus
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more virulent in new habitat 1.00
is more virulent 0.90
is virulent 0.89
be more difficult than prokaryotic pathogens 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pathogen, is virulent)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pathogen, is more virulent)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(pathogen, is more virulent)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pathogen, is virulent)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(pathogen, is more virulent)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pathogen, is virulent)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pathogen, be more difficult than prokaryotic pathogens)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pathogen, be more difficult than prokaryotic pathogens)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pathogen, be more difficult than prokaryotic pathogens)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pathogen, is more virulent)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pathogen, is virulent)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pathogen, be more difficult than prokaryotic pathogens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pathogen, be more virulent in new habitat)