pathology: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	department Weight: 0.63 , discipline Weight: 0.57 , field Weight: 0.56 , time Weight: 0.52
Siblings	myocardial infarction Weight: 0.68 , atherosclerosis Weight: 0.63 , inflammation Weight: 0.63 , cyst Weight: 0.61 , ischemia Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(pathology, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(pathology, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(discipline, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(pathology, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(atherosclerosis, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(atherosclerosis, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(inflammation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(pathology, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(field, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(atherosclerosis, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(field, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(pathology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)