pattern: be important in photography

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.73
, design pattern
Weight: 0.72
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings herringbone
Weight: 0.68
, rectangle
Weight: 0.66
, triangle
Weight: 0.64
, chevron
Weight: 0.64
, sequence
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in photography 1.00
be important in art 0.82
be used in art 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, be important in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rectangle, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rectangle, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pattern, be important in photography)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pattern, be important in art)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pattern, be important in art)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pattern, be important in art)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pattern, be used in art)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(pattern, be used in art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pattern, be used in art)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be important in art)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be used in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be important in photography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pattern, be important in photography)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be important in photography)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rectangle, be important in art)