pattern: exist in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.73
, design pattern
Weight: 0.72
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings herringbone
Weight: 0.68
, rectangle
Weight: 0.66
, triangle
Weight: 0.64
, chevron
Weight: 0.64
, sequence
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist in nature 1.00
be in nature 0.91
exist 0.89
be important in nature 0.89
exist in animals 0.85
exist among animals 0.81
be confined to just humans 0.76
be strongest shape in nature 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(characteristic, be confined to just humans)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pattern, exist in nature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be confined to just humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be confined to just humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(triangle, exist)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chevron, exist)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(characteristic, be confined to just humans)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chevron, exist)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chevron, exist)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(triangle, exist)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(triangle, exist)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pattern, exist in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pattern, be in nature)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pattern, exist)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be in nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be important in nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pattern, be in nature)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist among animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pattern, exist in animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(pattern, exist in animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pattern, exist)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pattern, exist in animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pattern, be in nature)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pattern, exist among animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(pattern, exist among animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pattern, exist among animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pattern, exist)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pattern, be important in nature)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pattern, be important in nature)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pattern, be important in nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pattern, exist in nature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(characteristic, be confined to just humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chevron, exist)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(triangle, exist)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(characteristic, be confined to just humans)