pattern: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.73
, design pattern
Weight: 0.72
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings herringbone
Weight: 0.68
, rectangle
Weight: 0.66
, triangle
Weight: 0.64
, chevron
Weight: 0.64
, sequence
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worth 0.82
has quality function 0.76
is really best 0.76
has quality questions 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(theme, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(theme, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chevron, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chevron, is really best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, has quality definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chevron, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sequence, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(theme, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(chevron, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chevron, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chevron, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(chevron, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(sequence, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sequence, has quality function)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chevron, is really best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chevron, is really best)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rectangle, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rectangle, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pattern, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pattern, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chevron, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chevron, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sequence, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chevron, is really best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rectangle, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(theme, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pattern, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality questions)