payment: be due date

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents card
Weight: 0.63
, contribution
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.59
, step
Weight: 0.59
Siblings settlement
Weight: 0.68
, rent
Weight: 0.66
, employer
Weight: 0.63
, allowance
Weight: 0.62
, fee
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be due date 1.00
be due date determined 0.96
has time date 0.88
be date determined 0.86
be on account due 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(payment, be due date)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(payment, be due date determined)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(payment, be due date determined)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(payment, be due date determined)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(payment, be on account due)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(payment, has time date)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(payment, be on account due)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(payment, be date determined)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(payment, be date determined)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(payment, has time date)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(payment, has time date)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(payment, be on account due)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(payment, be date determined)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(payment, be due date determined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(payment, has time date)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(payment, be date determined)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(payment, be on account due)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(payment, be due date)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, be due date) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(payment, be due date)