payment: be from contract sale

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents card
Weight: 0.63
, contribution
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.59
, step
Weight: 0.59
Siblings settlement
Weight: 0.68
, rent
Weight: 0.66
, employer
Weight: 0.63
, allowance
Weight: 0.62
, fee
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from contract sale 1.00
be from contract sale taxable 0.90
is deal 0.80
is big deal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(settlement, is big deal)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(settlement, is deal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(settlement, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(settlement, is deal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(settlement, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(settlement, is big deal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(payment, be from contract sale)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale taxable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, is deal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(payment, is deal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(payment, is deal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(payment, is deal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(payment, be from contract sale taxable)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(payment, is big deal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(payment, be from contract sale taxable)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(payment, be from contract sale taxable)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(payment, is big deal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(payment, is big deal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(payment, be from contract sale)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(settlement, is deal)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(settlement, is big deal)