pda: be bad in school

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.63
, cell phone
Weight: 0.60
, digital camera
Weight: 0.58
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.57
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, palm
Weight: 0.58
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, network device
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in school 1.00
be allowed in school 0.85
be banned in schools 0.77
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cell phone, be allowed in school)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pda, be bad in school)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pda, be bad in school)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be allowed in school)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be allowed in school)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(palm, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cell phone, be allowed in school)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cell phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(pda, be bad in school)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(palm, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(palm, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pda, be bad in school)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(pda, be banned in schools)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pda, be banned in schools)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pda, be banned in schools)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pda, be allowed in school)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pda, be banned in schools)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pda, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pda, be allowed in school)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pda, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pda, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pda, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pda, be allowed in school)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pda, be allowed in school)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pda, be bad in school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cell phone, be allowed in school)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(palm, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cell phone, be allowed in school)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pda, be bad in school)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cell phone, has quality bad)