pda: be big deal to women

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.63
, cell phone
Weight: 0.60
, digital camera
Weight: 0.58
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.57
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, palm
Weight: 0.58
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, network device
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be big deal to women 1.00
is big 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pda, be big deal to women)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pda, is big)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pda, is big)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pda, is big)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pda, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pda, be big deal to women)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pda, be big deal to women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pda, be big deal to women)