pdf: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.59
, format
Weight: 0.57
, information
Weight: 0.57
, document
Weight: 0.57
Siblings wikipedia
Weight: 0.35
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34
, google
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(google, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(google, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(google, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(google, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(google, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pdf, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pdf, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pdf, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pdf, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pdf, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pdf, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pdf, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pdf, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(google, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality better)