pea: have cooked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.64
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, legume
Weight: 0.63
Siblings black eyed pea
Weight: 0.66
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.36
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.36
, clover
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cooked 1.00
is cooked 0.99
cooked better and faster in pressure cooker 0.84
be cooked with difficulty 0.83
be used in cooking 0.81
cook faster in pressure cooker 0.79
is sauteed 0.77
be cooked with difficulty at hill station 0.77
is coated prior to frying 0.76
be considered salad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pea, have cooked)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, be considered salad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pea, have cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(potato salad, be considered salad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(potato salad, be considered salad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pea, have cooked)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pea, is cooked)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(pea, is cooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pea, is cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pea, is cooked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pea, be used in cooking)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pea, be used in cooking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pea, be used in cooking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pea, be used in cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pea, have cooked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pea, have cooked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato salad, be considered salad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(pea, have cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vegetable, cooked better and faster in pressure cooker)