peanut: be bad for horses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
, child
Weight: 0.59
Siblings peanut butter
Weight: 0.78
, olive oil
Weight: 0.36
, pet food
Weight: 0.35
, castor oil
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for horses 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.85
be bad luck in racing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(peanut butter, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(peanut, be bad for horses)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(peanut, be bad for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(peanut, be bad luck in racing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(peanut, be bad luck in racing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad luck in racing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(peanut, be bad for dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad luck in racing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for horses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for horses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for horses)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(peanut butter, be bad for dogs)