peanut: be cheaper than nuts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
, child
Weight: 0.59
Siblings peanut butter
Weight: 0.78
, olive oil
Weight: 0.36
, pet food
Weight: 0.35
, castor oil
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than nuts 1.00
be cheaper than other nuts 0.99
be worse than nuts 0.91
be worse than other nuts 0.91
be different from nuts 0.88
be different from other nuts 0.87
be similar to nuts 0.87
is really nuts 0.85
typically grow as two nuts 0.83
has physical part nuts 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(peanut, be different from other nuts)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(peanut, be different from nuts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(peanut, be similar to nuts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(peanut, be different from nuts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(peanut, be different from other nuts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(peanut, be worse than other nuts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(peanut, be similar to nuts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(peanut, be different from nuts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(peanut, be worse than nuts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(peanut, be similar to nuts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(peanut, be worse than nuts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(peanut, be different from other nuts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(peanut, be worse than other nuts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(peanut, has physical part nuts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(peanut, be worse than nuts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(peanut, be worse than other nuts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(peanut, has physical part nuts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(peanut, has physical part nuts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be worse than nuts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be worse than other nuts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(peanut, has physical part nuts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be similar to nuts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be different from nuts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be different from other nuts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(peanut, be cheaper than nuts)