pear: be called tuna

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.75
, flavor
Weight: 0.72
, fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, peach tree
Weight: 0.40
, grape
Weight: 0.39
, crab apple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called tuna 1.00
be called crab apples 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(pear, be called tuna)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crab apple, be called crab apples)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(pear, be called tuna)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crab apple, be called crab apples)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(crab apple, be called crab apples)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(pear, be called tuna)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(pear, be called tuna)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(pear, be called tuna)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pear, be called tuna)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(pear, be called tuna)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(pear, be called tuna)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pear, be called tuna)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(pear, be called tuna)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crab apple, be called crab apples)