pear: grow best in sweden

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.75
, flavor
Weight: 0.72
, fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, peach tree
Weight: 0.40
, grape
Weight: 0.39
, crab apple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
grow best in sweden 1.00
be grown than than england 0.80
be grown in france 0.79
be important to italy 0.79
grow well in california 0.78
be grown in south africa 0.77
be for heathly u 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grape, grow well in california)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(grape, be important to italy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(grape, be grown in france)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(grape, be grown in france)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(grape, be grown in france)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(grape, be important to italy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(grape, be important to italy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(grape, grow well in california)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(grape, grow well in california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pear, grow best in sweden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, grow best in sweden)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pear, grow best in sweden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(grape, be grown in france)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(grape, grow well in california)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, grow best in sweden)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grape, be important to italy)