peasant: were important to system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents poor people
Weight: 0.56
, land
Weight: 0.55
, work
Weight: 0.49
, man
Weight: 0.49
Siblings farmer
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.31
, plantation
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important to system 1.00
were important in society 0.82
were less important 0.81
be at bottom of system 0.77
were important to feudal system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(peasant, were important to system)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(peasant, be at bottom of system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(peasant, be at bottom of system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(peasant, were important in society)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(peasant, be at bottom of system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(peasant, were less important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(peasant, were important in society)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(peasant, were important in society)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peasant, were important to feudal system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(peasant, were less important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(peasant, were less important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(peasant, be at bottom of system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(peasant, were important to feudal system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were less important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were important in society)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(peasant, were important to feudal system)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were important to feudal system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were important to system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peasant, were important to system)