pedophilia: be considered repugnant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered repugnant 1.00
be considered morally repugnant 0.95
is immoral 0.80
is unethical 0.78
is unacceptable 0.78
is socially unacceptable 0.77
is legally unacceptable 0.77
be considered bad 0.76
is socially legally unacceptable 0.76
is universally condemned 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is universally condemned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is universally condemned)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is universally condemned)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is universally condemned)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cruelty, is immoral)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical)