pedophilia: be prevalent among tptb

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prevalent among tptb 1.00
is prevalent 0.93
be prevalent in judaism 0.88
be rampant among elite 0.83
be prevalent in healthcare environment 0.82
be prevalent in downtown 0.81
is widespread 0.77
seems more predominant in men 0.77
be more common in areas 0.77
be common among priests 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be rampant among elite)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be rampant among elite)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be rampant among elite)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be common among priests)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be common among priests)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be rampant among elite)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment)