pedophilia: be prevalent in judaism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prevalent in judaism 1.00
is prevalent 0.93
be prevalent among tptb 0.88
be prevalent in healthcare environment 0.82
be prevalent in downtown 0.80
be viewed in judaism christianity 0.78
seems predominant in men 0.78
seems more predominant in men 0.78
seems predominant 0.78
seems more predominant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adultery, be viewed in judaism christianity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(adultery, be viewed in judaism christianity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(adultery, be viewed in judaism christianity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be prevalent in healthcare environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(adultery, be viewed in judaism christianity)