pedophilia: is frowned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frowned 1.00
be frowned at at work 0.92
is frowned upon 0.91
be frowned upon upon work 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pornography, be frowned at at work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be frowned upon upon work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pornography, be frowned at at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pornography, be frowned at at work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be frowned upon upon work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be frowned upon upon work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is frowned)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is frowned upon)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is frowned upon)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is frowned upon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is frowned upon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is frowned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is frowned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pornography, be frowned at at work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is frowned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be frowned upon upon work)