pedophilia: is unacceptable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unacceptable 1.00
is legally unacceptable 0.91
is socially unacceptable 0.90
is socially legally unacceptable 0.84
is acceptable 0.83
is immoral 0.78
be considered repugnant 0.78
is unethical 0.76
be considered morally repugnant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is acceptable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(adultery, is acceptable)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(adultery, is acceptable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cruelty, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is immoral)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is legally unacceptable)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is unacceptable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(adultery, is acceptable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cruelty, is immoral)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical)