pedophilia: is universally condemned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is universally condemned 1.00
is condemned 0.91
be universally considered wrong 0.85
be considered repugnant 0.76
be considered morally repugnant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(adultery, be universally considered wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(adultery, be universally considered wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(adultery, be universally considered wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is universally condemned)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is condemned)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is condemned)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is condemned)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is condemned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered morally repugnant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be considered repugnant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is universally condemned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is universally condemned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is universally condemned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(adultery, be universally considered wrong)