pedophilia: seems more predominant

Property	Similarity
seems more predominant	1.00
seems predominant	0.99
seems more predominant in men	0.97
seems predominant in men	0.96
is prevalent	0.80
is less common	0.78
be prevalent in judaism	0.78
be prevalent among tptb	0.77
be prevalent in every downtown	0.76

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems predominant)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems predominant)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems predominant)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is less common)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(pedophilia, is less common)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is less common)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems predominant)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(pedophilia, is less common)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

Parents	crime Weight: 0.68 , atrocity Weight: 0.63 , mental disorder Weight: 0.60 , evil Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.57
Siblings	pornography Weight: 0.36 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.35 , adultery Weight: 0.34 , obsessive compulsive disorder Weight: 0.34 , cruelty Weight: 0.34

pedophilia: seems more predominant

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings