pedophilia: seems more predominant in men

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
seems more predominant in men 1.00
seems predominant in men 0.99
seems more predominant 0.97
seems predominant 0.96
is prevalent 0.79
is less common 0.78
be prevalent in judaism 0.78
be prevalent among tptb 0.77
be prevalent in every downtown 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is prevalent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems predominant in men)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is less common)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is less common)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is less common)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, seems predominant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is less common)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent in judaism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, seems more predominant in men)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is prevalent)