peel: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.47
, man
Weight: 0.43
, thing
Weight: 0.42
, leftovers
Weight: 0.42
Siblings banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, eggplant
Weight: 0.32
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31
, onion
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(peel, taste bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(peel, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(peel, taste bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(peel, taste bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(peel, taste bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(peel, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(peel, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(peel, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)