pelican: be important to louisiana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.60
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, sea lion
Weight: 0.51
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, heron
Weight: 0.39
, seagull
Weight: 0.38
, gull
Weight: 0.38
, blue bird
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to louisiana 1.00
be in kansas 0.80
be in illinois 0.79
be in nebraska 0.78
be in iowa 0.78
be in colorado 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be in colorado)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(seagull, be in colorado)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(seagull, be in colorado)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pelican, be important to louisiana)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pelican, be in kansas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pelican, be in illinois)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pelican, be in kansas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pelican, be in illinois)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(pelican, be in iowa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(pelican, be in nebraska)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(pelican, be in colorado)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pelican, be in kansas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be in kansas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pelican, be in illinois)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pelican, be in iowa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be in illinois)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pelican, be in iowa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pelican, be in colorado)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pelican, be in nebraska)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pelican, be in colorado)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pelican, be in nebraska)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be in iowa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be in colorado)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be in nebraska)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pelican, be important to louisiana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be important to louisiana)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(seagull, be in colorado)