pelican: be like penguins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.60
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, sea lion
Weight: 0.51
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, heron
Weight: 0.39
, seagull
Weight: 0.38
, gull
Weight: 0.38
, blue bird
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like penguins 1.00
eat other birds 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seagull, eat other birds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(seagull, eat other birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(seagull, eat other birds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pelican, be like penguins)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pelican, eat other birds)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pelican, eat other birds)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pelican, eat other birds)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelican, eat other birds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be like penguins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pelican, be like penguins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pelican, be like penguins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(seagull, eat other birds)