pelican: has physical part mouths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.60
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, sea lion
Weight: 0.51
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, heron
Weight: 0.39
, seagull
Weight: 0.38
, gull
Weight: 0.38
, blue bird
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part mouths 1.00
have big mouths 0.92
has physical part beaks 0.83
have big beaks 0.77
have long beaks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pelican, has physical part mouths)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pelican, has physical part beaks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pelican, have big mouths)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(pelican, has physical part beaks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pelican, have big mouths)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part beaks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pelican, has physical part beaks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pelican, have big mouths)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pelican, have big beaks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pelican, have big mouths)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pelican, have long beaks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pelican, have long beaks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pelican, have big beaks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pelican, have long beaks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pelican, have big beaks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pelican, have long beaks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pelican, have big beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)