pelvis: be located on map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bone
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.57
, body part
Weight: 0.49
, blood vessel
Weight: 0.47
, human body
Weight: 0.46
Siblings coccyx
Weight: 0.42
, clavicle
Weight: 0.36
, sacrum
Weight: 0.36
, scapula
Weight: 0.35
, rib cage
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located on map 1.00
is located 0.85
be located on woman 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(coccyx, is located)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sacrum, is located)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(sacrum, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sacrum, is located)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(coccyx, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(coccyx, is located)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pelvis, be located on map)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pelvis, is located)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pelvis, is located)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, be located on woman)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pelvis, is located)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pelvis, be located on woman)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(pelvis, be located on woman)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pelvis, be located on woman)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, is located)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, be located on map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pelvis, be located on map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sacrum, is located)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, be located on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(coccyx, is located)