pelvis: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bone
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.57
, body part
Weight: 0.49
, blood vessel
Weight: 0.47
, human body
Weight: 0.46
Siblings coccyx
Weight: 0.42
, clavicle
Weight: 0.36
, sacrum
Weight: 0.36
, scapula
Weight: 0.35
, rib cage
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pelvis, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pelvis, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pelvis, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pelvis, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pelvis, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pelvis, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pelvis, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(pelvis, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)