penetration: is examples

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.52
, issue
Weight: 0.50
, process
Weight: 0.50
Siblings saturation
Weight: 0.32
, presence
Weight: 0.32
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.31
, prevalence
Weight: 0.31
, depth
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is examples 1.00
be use examples 0.97
be related use examples 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(penetration, is examples)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(penetration, is examples)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be use examples)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(factor, be related use examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(factor, be use examples)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(penetration, is examples)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(penetration, is examples)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(penetration, is examples)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(penetration, is examples)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(penetration, is examples)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be use examples)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be use examples)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(penetration, is examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)