penetration: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.52
, issue
Weight: 0.50
, process
Weight: 0.50
Siblings saturation
Weight: 0.32
, presence
Weight: 0.32
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.31
, prevalence
Weight: 0.31
, depth
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
be important in work 0.87
play work 0.87
be in business system work 0.80
be important in social work 0.78
work together increase 0.78
quit working 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(penetration, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(process, work)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(penetration, work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(service, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(penetration, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(service, be in business system work)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(penetration, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(penetration, work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(process, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(factor, work together increase)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(service, be in business system work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(service, be important in social work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, be important in social work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, work together increase)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(service, be in business system work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(saturation, quit working)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(saturation, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(penetration, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(process, work)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(penetration, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(service, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(penetration, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(service, be in business system work)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(penetration, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(penetration, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(saturation, work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(saturation, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(saturation, quit working)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(saturation, quit working)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(penetration, work)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(penetration, play work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(penetration, play work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(penetration, play work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(penetration, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(process, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(service, be in business system work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(service, be important in social work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(saturation, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(saturation, quit working)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(process, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(service, be in business system work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(penetration, work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(service, be important in social work)