penis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reproductive organ
Weight: 0.61
, question
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings vagina
Weight: 0.36
, fallopian tube
Weight: 0.35
, testicle
Weight: 0.34
, nipple
Weight: 0.34
, uterus
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be considered bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(penis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(penis, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(penis, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(penis, be considered bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(penis, be considered bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(penis, be considered bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(penis, be considered bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(penis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(penis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)