pennsylvania: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
was 33rd state 0.92
was state 0.92
be called state 0.89
is commonwealth state 0.84
is best state 0.80
is poor state 0.79
be good state for agriculture 0.77
be called oil state 0.77
is community property state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is community property state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(new york city, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new york, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(wisconsin, is community property state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, has state state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(indiana, is best state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was state)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was state)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is commonwealth state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called oil state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is commonwealth state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, be called oil state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is commonwealth state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, is commonwealth state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called oil state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was 33rd state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called oil state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is community property state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(connecticut, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(new york, has state state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is community property state)