pennsylvania: have 20 electoral votes

Related concepts

Parents	wisconsin Weight: 0.60 , new york Weight: 0.59 , new york city Weight: 0.59 , new england Weight: 0.57
Siblings	west virginia Weight: 0.76 , massachusetts Weight: 0.63 , indiana Weight: 0.60 , ohio Weight: 0.35 , connecticut Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have 21 electoral votes	1.00
have 20 electoral votes	1.00
have 20 votes	0.91
have more electoral votes than new mexico	0.91
have special election	0.83
vote today	0.82
have two primaries	0.77
increase cost of recount	0.75
is democratic state	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(wisconsin, increase cost of recount) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(wisconsin, increase cost of recount)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, increase cost of recount)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(ohio, have special election)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is democratic state)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(ohio, vote today)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is democratic state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(wisconsin, increase cost of recount) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(ohio, vote today) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(ohio, vote today)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(ohio, have special election) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(ohio, have special election)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(massachusetts, is democratic state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is democratic state)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(connecticut, is democratic state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(connecticut, is democratic state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, vote today)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is democratic state)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, vote today)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, vote today)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is democratic state)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, is democratic state)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, vote today)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is democratic state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(wisconsin, increase cost of recount)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(ohio, vote today)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(massachusetts, is democratic state)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(ohio, have special election)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(connecticut, is democratic state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(wisconsin, increase cost of recount)